Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35271 - 35280 of 83159 for case code.
Search results 35271 - 35280 of 83159 for case code.
State v. Parish M. Golden
to counter the State’s claim that this was an open and shut case. Further, at the time of opening statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2432 - 2005-03-31
to counter the State’s claim that this was an open and shut case. Further, at the time of opening statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2432 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James J. Bartow
stated that field sobriety tests need not be done in every case; the purpose is to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14097 - 2014-09-15
stated that field sobriety tests need not be done in every case; the purpose is to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14097 - 2014-09-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Allen E. Schatz
2005 WI 10 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 04-0654-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16827 - 2005-03-31
2005 WI 10 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 04-0654-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16827 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
granted the Shepherds’ motion to reopen the case. CAC voluntarily dismissed its complaint while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93300 - 2014-09-15
granted the Shepherds’ motion to reopen the case. CAC voluntarily dismissed its complaint while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93300 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95377 - 2013-04-16
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95377 - 2013-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, and thus has failed to show that counsel acted unreasonably by not pursuing suppression. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42482 - 2009-10-21
in this case, and thus has failed to show that counsel acted unreasonably by not pursuing suppression. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42482 - 2009-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the adjudicated father’s parental rights. His case is not before us. 4 D.K. was born on January 9, 2018
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271651 - 2020-07-28
of the adjudicated father’s parental rights. His case is not before us. 4 D.K. was born on January 9, 2018
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271651 - 2020-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Sheryl D. Stuckey
.2d 664, 667 (Ct. App. 1992). No. 97-2285-CR 4 The instant case involves a charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12850 - 2017-09-21
.2d 664, 667 (Ct. App. 1992). No. 97-2285-CR 4 The instant case involves a charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12850 - 2017-09-21
Alwyn Pederson v. Debra Hewitt
Pederson cites several cases in which subjective intent was dispositive, and argues that summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16141 - 2005-03-31
Pederson cites several cases in which subjective intent was dispositive, and argues that summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16141 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and without the guardian ad litem (GAL) waiving his attendance in writing prior to the hearing. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135538 - 2017-09-21
and without the guardian ad litem (GAL) waiving his attendance in writing prior to the hearing. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135538 - 2017-09-21