Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35271 - 35280 of 63197 for records.
Search results 35271 - 35280 of 63197 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=557216 - 2022-08-23
independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=557216 - 2022-08-23
[PDF]
Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
in ruling that there was no forgery, pointing to evidence in the record that supports their position.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13142 - 2017-09-21
in ruling that there was no forgery, pointing to evidence in the record that supports their position.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13142 - 2017-09-21
Carolyn Rae Jarman v. Larry Howard Welter
the percentage standard, the court shall state in writing or on the record the amount of support that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21398 - 2006-03-22
the percentage standard, the court shall state in writing or on the record the amount of support that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21398 - 2006-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS
court reviews the record as a whole, including the reconfinement orders, to determine the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60825 - 2011-03-08
court reviews the record as a whole, including the reconfinement orders, to determine the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60825 - 2011-03-08
State v. Carl J. Johnson, Jr.
concluded that the “record does not show that parole policy was a factor that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18238 - 2005-05-23
concluded that the “record does not show that parole policy was a factor that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18238 - 2005-05-23
Joseph Anthuber v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Company
a discretionary decision, “there should be evidence in the record that discretion was in fact exercised.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9083 - 2005-03-31
a discretionary decision, “there should be evidence in the record that discretion was in fact exercised.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9083 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55470 - 2009-11-10
a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55470 - 2009-11-10
State v. Kenneth R. Parrish
that the trial court should have conducted a discharge hearing. The record reflects that between August 12, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20778 - 2005-12-27
that the trial court should have conducted a discharge hearing. The record reflects that between August 12, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20778 - 2005-12-27
CA Blank Order
responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103477 - 2013-10-22
responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103477 - 2013-10-22
Rosie M. Bowers v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
the record most favorably to Bowers, it contains no evidence to show that the ice was on the porch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10590 - 2015-07-12
the record most favorably to Bowers, it contains no evidence to show that the ice was on the porch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10590 - 2015-07-12