Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35271 - 35280 of 58253 for speedy trial.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to a jury. After the trial court granted Guerrero several time extensions to consider his decision, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121017 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] County of Jefferson v. Leslie L. Crook
a reasonable suspicion sufficient to make the stop. The trial court denied the motion and found Crook guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10934 - 2017-09-20

State v. Paul J. Koch
and because the attached documents were not incorporated by reference into the complaint. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13237 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
supervision. Sewpersaud filed a postconviction motion alleging that he was entitled to a new trial based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522359 - 2022-05-17

State v. Corie S. Bergeron
motion for sentence credit. Bergeron contends the trial court erred by refusing to apply a thirty-one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14371 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard W. Foelker
. Prior to trial, Foelker moved to suppress the results of the breath and blood tests on grounds that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10528 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
seeking to withdraw a plea before sentencing must present a fair and just reason which the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75603 - 2011-12-27

John M. Tries v. City of Milwaukee
theories to support his claim, all of which proved unsuccessful in the trial court. He limits this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6842 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Kenneth Holz appeals from a circuit court judgment, following a jury trial, dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94665 - 2013-04-02

Sentry Insurance v. Jim Piontek Trucking, Inc.
that the trial court erred by concluding Commercial Union did not owe a duty to defend or indemnify Piontek under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11035 - 2005-03-31