Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35281 - 35290 of 38899 for c's.
Search results 35281 - 35290 of 38899 for c's.
State v. Albert E. Morrow
). Pursuant to § 346.63(1)(c), there is “a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21740 - 2006-03-13
). Pursuant to § 346.63(1)(c), there is “a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21740 - 2006-03-13
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
the judgment of conviction. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. No. 2007AP2346-CR(C) ¶29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23
the judgment of conviction. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. No. 2007AP2346-CR(C) ¶29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law. (c) The allegations and other factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36075 - 2009-04-07
, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law. (c) The allegations and other factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36075 - 2009-04-07
2007 WI APP 248
for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Order reversed and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30673 - 2007-11-27
for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Order reversed and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30673 - 2007-11-27
State v. Leah B. Hensiak
reports. No. 02-2816-CR(C) ¶19 LUNDSTEN, J. (concurring). I agree with the result in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5802 - 2005-03-31
reports. No. 02-2816-CR(C) ¶19 LUNDSTEN, J. (concurring). I agree with the result in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5802 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Certification
court. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.62(1r)(c)3 (satisfying criteria for supreme court review
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455186 - 2021-11-24
court. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.62(1r)(c)3 (satisfying criteria for supreme court review
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455186 - 2021-11-24
[PDF]
State v. Eric Rodriguez
Rodriguez. C. The trial court properly denied Rodriguez’s postconviction motion. ¶24 Rodriguez filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14328 - 2014-09-15
Rodriguez. C. The trial court properly denied Rodriguez’s postconviction motion. ¶24 Rodriguez filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14328 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Demetrius R. Powell
, there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. C. Mistrial ¶16 Powell also argues that a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5833 - 2017-09-19
, there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. C. Mistrial ¶16 Powell also argues that a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5833 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2011AP2698-CR 14 C. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. ¶23 Finally, Jackson argues that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87870 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2011AP2698-CR 14 C. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. ¶23 Finally, Jackson argues that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87870 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 102
.)); Nedrow v. Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., 70 N.W.2d 843, 844 (Iowa 1955) (“[C]onditions may be wholly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99845 - 2017-09-21
.)); Nedrow v. Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., 70 N.W.2d 843, 844 (Iowa 1955) (“[C]onditions may be wholly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99845 - 2017-09-21