Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35281 - 35290 of 55311 for n c c.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with a No. 2015AP190-CR 2 value greater than $10,000, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.34(1)(c) (2013-14). 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162500 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
)(c)1; 939.62(1)(b); and 973.01(2)(d)5. The court imposed four years, consisting of two years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92004 - 2014-09-15

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Charles Glynn
with reasonable requests for information. (c) His failure to protect the client adequately against entry
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17542 - 2011-02-14

State v. Janusz Daca
by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2001-02). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7360 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
the impact of in-court testimony.” See WIS. STAT. § 906.11(1)(c) (requiring a judge to “exercise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958308 - 2025-05-21

Gerald O. v. Cindy R.
the home. (c) Whether the child has substantial relationships with the parent or other family members
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10626 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the value of her marital property that was improperly gifted to them. “[C]onstructive trust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168418 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
provided ineffective assistance for failing to raise this issue fails as well. C. Penalty Enhancer. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28154 - 2007-02-20

COURT OF APPEALS
(1)(c). At the hearing the court found in connection with the guardianship petition that Jim suffers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60886 - 2011-03-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 56, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). As the circuit court observed, “[c]ertainly anyone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79224 - 2012-03-07