Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3531 - 3540 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3531 - 3540 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
that made the situation custodial. ΒΆ12 When reviewing a motion to suppress: [W]e engage in a two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61400 - 2014-09-15
that made the situation custodial. ΒΆ12 When reviewing a motion to suppress: [W]e engage in a two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61400 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
custody, placement, and reasonable support, and No. 2022AP126 2 an order establishing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823721 - 2024-07-09
custody, placement, and reasonable support, and No. 2022AP126 2 an order establishing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823721 - 2024-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
custody, placement, and reasonable support, and No. 2022AP126 2 an order establishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823721 - 2024-07-09
custody, placement, and reasonable support, and No. 2022AP126 2 an order establishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823721 - 2024-07-09
State v. Susan M. Goetz
granted the motion, concluding that Goetz was in custody at the time she gave her statements. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3814 - 2005-03-31
granted the motion, concluding that Goetz was in custody at the time she gave her statements. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3814 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Susan M. Goetz
1 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). No. 01-0954-CR 2 she was not in custody when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3814 - 2017-09-20
1 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). No. 01-0954-CR 2 she was not in custody when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3814 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Douglas County v. Michael R.L.
to that statement, which was faxed to the court at 3:36 p.m., Michael was taken into custody at 3:15 p.m. because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7666 - 2017-09-19
to that statement, which was faxed to the court at 3:36 p.m., Michael was taken into custody at 3:15 p.m. because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7666 - 2017-09-19
Douglas County v. Michael R.L.
. According to that statement, which was faxed to the court at 3:36 p.m., Michael was taken into custody at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7666 - 2005-03-31
. According to that statement, which was faxed to the court at 3:36 p.m., Michael was taken into custody at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7666 - 2005-03-31
Anthony J. Verdone v. Bolton Refuge House
the custodial parent in a child custody proceeding may be liable for damages to the noncustodial parent when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10625 - 2005-03-31
the custodial parent in a child custody proceeding may be liable for damages to the noncustodial parent when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10625 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2018, which Edwards amended on November 12, 2018, and a motion to change legal custody, physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676420 - 2023-07-11
, 2018, which Edwards amended on November 12, 2018, and a motion to change legal custody, physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676420 - 2023-07-11
COURT OF APPEALS
contention that the circuit court should have granted his motion to reopen an April 2007 judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96240 - 2013-05-01
contention that the circuit court should have granted his motion to reopen an April 2007 judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96240 - 2013-05-01