Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3531 - 3540 of 29996 for de.
Search results 3531 - 3540 of 29996 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
involuntary is a legal question that we review de novo. This distinction is crucial in this case. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43713 - 2009-11-18
involuntary is a legal question that we review de novo. This distinction is crucial in this case. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43713 - 2009-11-18
State v. Michael J. Arpke
an undisputed set of facts, which we review de novo. State v. Edgeberg, 188 Wis. 2d 339, 344-45, 524 N.W.2d 911
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3625 - 2005-03-31
an undisputed set of facts, which we review de novo. State v. Edgeberg, 188 Wis. 2d 339, 344-45, 524 N.W.2d 911
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3625 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and prejudice are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99346 - 2013-07-16
and prejudice are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99346 - 2013-07-16
[PDF]
Curt Wenzel v. Kristy Peters
de novo a decision to dismiss for insufficient evidence at the close of the plaintiffs’ case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4331 - 2017-09-19
de novo a decision to dismiss for insufficient evidence at the close of the plaintiffs’ case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4331 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32475 - 2008-04-16
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32475 - 2008-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. (emphasis added; citation omitted). “Whether a new factor exists presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379250 - 2021-06-23
. (emphasis added; citation omitted). “Whether a new factor exists presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379250 - 2021-06-23
[PDF]
Louis J. Ferris v. Ex-Chancellor Judith L. Kuipers
a decision granting summary judgment de novo, benefiting from the circuit court’s analysis. Lambrecht v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7040 - 2017-09-20
a decision granting summary judgment de novo, benefiting from the circuit court’s analysis. Lambrecht v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7040 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Constance R. Smith v. Philip G. Smith
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6901 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6901 - 2017-09-20
State v. David J. Pettit
competency is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pharm, 2000 WI App 167, ¶11, 238 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4596 - 2005-03-31
competency is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pharm, 2000 WI App 167, ¶11, 238 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4596 - 2005-03-31
State v. Victoria M. Webster
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: robert de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15082 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: robert de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15082 - 2005-03-31