Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3531 - 3540 of 29740 for des.
Search results 3531 - 3540 of 29740 for des.
CA Blank Order
and prejudice are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99346 - 2013-07-16
and prejudice are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99346 - 2013-07-16
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Mueller
He now renews this argument on appeal. This is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8927 - 2017-09-19
He now renews this argument on appeal. This is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8927 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Arpke
a question of law based upon an undisputed set of facts, which we review de novo. State v. Edgeberg, 188
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3625 - 2017-09-19
a question of law based upon an undisputed set of facts, which we review de novo. State v. Edgeberg, 188
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3625 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factor is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶36, 333 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86137 - 2014-09-15
factor is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶36, 333 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86137 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31167 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31167 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Curt Wenzel v. Kristy Peters
de novo a decision to dismiss for insufficient evidence at the close of the plaintiffs’ case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4331 - 2017-09-19
de novo a decision to dismiss for insufficient evidence at the close of the plaintiffs’ case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4331 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Walter Rieckhoff
¶4 This case presents a question of law based upon an undisputed set of facts, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3201 - 2017-09-19
¶4 This case presents a question of law based upon an undisputed set of facts, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3201 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
involuntary is a legal question that we review de novo. This distinction is crucial in this case. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43713 - 2009-11-18
involuntary is a legal question that we review de novo. This distinction is crucial in this case. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43713 - 2009-11-18
CA Blank Order
Shireman’s motions to dismiss. This appeal follows. We review de novo the grant or denial of summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96927 - 2013-05-21
Shireman’s motions to dismiss. This appeal follows. We review de novo the grant or denial of summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96927 - 2013-05-21
State v. David C. Haubrich
is a legal matter that we decide de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2198 - 2005-03-31
is a legal matter that we decide de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2198 - 2005-03-31