Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3531 - 3540 of 29333 for er.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for conditional release. He argues the circuit court erred by excluding evidence at his conditional release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774135 - 2024-03-13

[PDF] NOTICE
Bryant A. claims his trial counsel was ineffective for multiple reasons and the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35018 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are the two arguments that they now attempt to renew on appeal: (1) the circuit court erred in making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306146 - 2020-11-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
intoxicated (OWI). Baehni argues that the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189490 - 2017-09-21

State v. Isace A. Whiting
the circuit court erred by not granting his motion to suppress evidence seized from his residence after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5415 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
) the circuit court erred when it adjudicated his daughters CHIPS because they were without a parent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15193 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP1541-CRNM 2 to claims that: (1) the circuit court erred by denying Stites’s pretrial motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248917 - 2019-10-17

[PDF] State v. Thomas L. Stafford
for violating the terms of a domestic abuse injunction. Stafford asserts that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4995 - 2017-09-19

Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. Wild Goose Inn, Inc.
that the trial court erred in: (1) granting partial summary judgment to Capitol Indemnity on its counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7909 - 2005-03-31

Singh Constructors, Inc. v. Traylor Bros., Inc.
the defendants. Singh argues that the trial court erred in concluding that the defendants did not breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9297 - 2005-03-31