Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3531 - 3540 of 83330 for simple case search.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, which analyzed the case using the principles of probable cause to search. Notwithstanding, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124830 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
was an unreasonable search because his offense was a noncriminal violation, and exigent circumstances did not exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66409 - 2011-06-22

COURT OF APPEALS
by the circuit court, which analyzed the case using the principles of probable cause to search. Notwithstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124830 - 2014-10-27

[PDF] State v. John E. Kehler
Fischer testified that during the search of Kehler's automobile, he looked in a toilet case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10592 - 2017-09-20

State v. John E. Kehler
cross-examination of a state witness regarding consent to search his automobile. We affirm on these two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10592 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. In Brown County Circuit Court case No. 2011CF705, the State charged Machicote with attempted armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104804 - 2017-09-21

State v. Martin J. Zielinski
that under the particular facts in this case, the search was reasonable; therefore, the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19635 - 2005-09-19

State v. Jeremy J. Mayotte
to suppress evidence seized in two searches of his home, which were conducted pursuant to search warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20905 - 2006-01-09

[PDF] State v. Jeremy J. Mayotte
also appeals an order denying his motion to suppress evidence seized in two searches of his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20905 - 2017-09-21

State v. Wendell L. Gaines
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7868 - 2005-03-31