Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3531 - 3540 of 6409 for wide.

August Collura v. St. Mary's Hospital of Milwaukee
the stool was a camera head twenty-four inches wide, which appears in a photograph both parties have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15185 - 2005-03-31

County of Walworth v. Dillis V. Allen
has wide discretion in developing the specific language of jury instructions.” State v. Foster, 191
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6199 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
at 311. The defendant must prove both that counsel’s conduct was deficient, or, outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101510 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Conrad J. Korbisch
). Professionally competent assistance encompasses a “wide range” of behaviors. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2838 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of counsel that were “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862199 - 2024-10-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
representation, a defendant must point to specific acts or omissions by counsel that are “outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149643 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. We disagree. ¶20 The trial court has wide discretion in determining whether or not to admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120946 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was “an [e]rroneous [e]xercise of [d]iscretion.” Generally, the circuit court has wide discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186849 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
” and there is a strong presumption that trial counsel’s conduct “falls within the wide range of reasonable professional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94724 - 2013-04-02

State v. Corey A. Chatfield
that counsel’s conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance; that is, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2219 - 2005-03-31