Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35301 - 35310 of 63199 for records.
Search results 35301 - 35310 of 63199 for records.
State v. Herman L. Richardson
reject this argument for two reasons. First, Richardson provides no citation to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16199 - 2005-03-31
reject this argument for two reasons. First, Richardson provides no citation to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16199 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
recalled five months earlier but the county records had not been updated. The court observed that “[w]hen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44070 - 2009-11-30
recalled five months earlier but the county records had not been updated. The court observed that “[w]hen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44070 - 2009-11-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97209 - 2014-09-15
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97209 - 2014-09-15
Joseph Anthuber v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Company
a discretionary decision, “there should be evidence in the record that discretion was in fact exercised.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9083 - 2005-03-31
a discretionary decision, “there should be evidence in the record that discretion was in fact exercised.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9083 - 2005-03-31
State v. James S. Poehlman
Given the record before the jury, we conclude that the circuit court was correct in modifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18632 - 2005-06-20
Given the record before the jury, we conclude that the circuit court was correct in modifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18632 - 2005-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
grounds for a suppression motion. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737034 - 2023-12-05
grounds for a suppression motion. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737034 - 2023-12-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the subpoenas served on one of its officers. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522347 - 2022-05-24
the subpoenas served on one of its officers. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522347 - 2022-05-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for one of his offenses. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522359 - 2022-05-17
for one of his offenses. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522359 - 2022-05-17
Harry Bruce Pomeroy v. Jennifer Ann Pomeroy
decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26289 - 2006-08-23
decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26289 - 2006-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS
facts are taken from the record. In 1994, Klawitter and Howe entered into a contract with Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34799 - 2008-12-03
facts are taken from the record. In 1994, Klawitter and Howe entered into a contract with Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34799 - 2008-12-03