Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35321 - 35330 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35321 - 35330 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. James Hubert Tucker, Jr.
denial of his motion for sentence modification under Wis. Stat. § 809.30(2)(h)(2001-02). 1 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17866 - 2017-09-21
denial of his motion for sentence modification under Wis. Stat. § 809.30(2)(h)(2001-02). 1 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17866 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257595 - 2020-04-15
denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257595 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
Diana R. Van Pelt v. Ever Green Growers, Inc.
Company of Wisconsin (General Casualty) appeals from an order denying its summary judgment motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9227 - 2017-09-19
Company of Wisconsin (General Casualty) appeals from an order denying its summary judgment motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9227 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Charles F. Polenz v. TCI Cablevision of Wisconsin, Inc.
to TCI’s motion is an affidavit from Polenz. In it, Polenz acknowledges receipt of a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13695 - 2014-09-15
to TCI’s motion is an affidavit from Polenz. In it, Polenz acknowledges receipt of a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13695 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion for a new trial. Wilson was convicted of six counts 1 arising out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207335 - 2018-01-23
his postconviction motion for a new trial. Wilson was convicted of six counts 1 arising out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207335 - 2018-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
as a felon and for felony bail-jumping, and from a postconviction order denying his motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50339 - 2010-05-24
as a felon and for felony bail-jumping, and from a postconviction order denying his motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50339 - 2010-05-24
2009 WI APP 165
, and her daughter’s tuition. ¶8 Following the initial verdict, the parties filed competing motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42630 - 2011-02-07
, and her daughter’s tuition. ¶8 Following the initial verdict, the parties filed competing motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42630 - 2011-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion for production and in camera inspection of D.M.O.’s counseling records. The motion asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53723 - 2010-08-25
a motion for production and in camera inspection of D.M.O.’s counseling records. The motion asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53723 - 2010-08-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-merit response is that appellate counsel did not file a postconviction motion, so the issues raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191002 - 2017-09-21
no-merit response is that appellate counsel did not file a postconviction motion, so the issues raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191002 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 165
, the parties filed competing motions after verdict related to attorney fees and costs. The Stys sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42630 - 2014-09-15
, the parties filed competing motions after verdict related to attorney fees and costs. The Stys sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42630 - 2014-09-15