Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35321 - 35330 of 46923 for shows.

City of Delavan v. Roger Sterken
exists when the State can show that a “fair probability” exists that contraband, such as drugs or drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20368 - 2005-11-22

State v. Bee Bus Line
that the stand-by drivers worked irregular hours, since they only worked if a regular driver did not show up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11078 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to Brann’s show of authority, which happened prior to discovery of the cocaine. See California v. Hodari D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191171 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
shows that no probable cause determination was made prior to the referral for a competency examination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851069 - 2024-09-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the injunction hearing shows by a preponderance of the evidence that there was a substantial risk Higgins may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273087 - 2020-07-28

Frontsheet
a showing of his inability to pay the costs, Benjamin J. Harris's license to practice law in Wisconsin shall
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46713 - 2010-02-03

[PDF] City of Two Rivers v. Thomas J. Lavey
Wis.2d 463, 473, 529 N.W.2d 594, 598 (1995). The evidence clearly shows that Lavey's sign promoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7926 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of Two Rivers v. Thomas J. Lavey
Wis.2d 463, 473, 529 N.W.2d 594, 598 (1995). The evidence clearly shows that Lavey's sign promoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7925 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael A. Smaxwell
they be used to show probable cause for issuance of a warrant.” However, the court in Williams did not state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15924 - 2017-09-21

State v. David A. Prusinski
between a shackled accused and one or more members of the jury insufficient to show prejudice.” Harrell v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11175 - 2005-03-31