Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35331 - 35340 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35331 - 35340 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. William Staples
that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Specifically, Staples argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2697 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Specifically, Staples argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2697 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jose Lomeli-Lozano
a minimum of five years in initial confinement. Lozano filed a postconviction motion seeking sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20800 - 2005-12-27
a minimum of five years in initial confinement. Lozano filed a postconviction motion seeking sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20800 - 2005-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 29, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. The motion asked that claims against Bartelt and Filo individually be dismissed because they acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27250 - 2005-03-31
. The motion asked that claims against Bartelt and Filo individually be dismissed because they acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27250 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard L. Harris
postconviction motion. Harris claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10759 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. Harris claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10759 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. In April 2011, the trial court denied Brennan’s motion for summary judgment in a written order.[2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107550 - 2014-01-27
. In April 2011, the trial court denied Brennan’s motion for summary judgment in a written order.[2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107550 - 2014-01-27
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2003-04).[1] He appeals from judgments of conviction and a postconviction order[2] denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29787 - 2007-07-23
) (2003-04).[1] He appeals from judgments of conviction and a postconviction order[2] denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29787 - 2007-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence based on a lack of reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66557 - 2011-06-28
court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence based on a lack of reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66557 - 2011-06-28
2008 WI App 181
court granted the motion, and the case proceeded to trial on the remaining claims. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34709 - 2011-06-14
court granted the motion, and the case proceeded to trial on the remaining claims. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34709 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
WI App 181
the motion, and the case proceeded to trial on the remaining claims. ¶8 In its opening statement, the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34709 - 2014-09-15
the motion, and the case proceeded to trial on the remaining claims. ¶8 In its opening statement, the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34709 - 2014-09-15
State v. James Hubert Tucker, Jr.
, affirming the circuit court's denial of his motion for sentence modification under Wis. Stat. § 809.30(2)(h
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17866 - 2005-05-03
, affirming the circuit court's denial of his motion for sentence modification under Wis. Stat. § 809.30(2)(h
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17866 - 2005-05-03