Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35331 - 35340 of 68218 for did.
Search results 35331 - 35340 of 68218 for did.
State v. Cheryl C. Britton
, did you see anything what I would construe to be illegal in the building and she said no. I asked her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11173 - 2005-03-31
, did you see anything what I would construe to be illegal in the building and she said no. I asked her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cinda L.
), was denied. Cinda contends that the circuit court did not engage in a proper colloquy with her concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3589 - 2017-09-19
), was denied. Cinda contends that the circuit court did not engage in a proper colloquy with her concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3589 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the last day of the thirty-day deadline.2 However, Carlson did not serve copies of the authenticated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858657 - 2024-10-08
, the last day of the thirty-day deadline.2 However, Carlson did not serve copies of the authenticated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858657 - 2024-10-08
State v. Scott E. Laituri
subject to collateral attack …. The court concluded Laituri did not meet these criteria. DISCUSSION ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7041 - 2005-03-31
subject to collateral attack …. The court concluded Laituri did not meet these criteria. DISCUSSION ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7041 - 2005-03-31
State v. Perry H. Hollis
the defendant’s clothing for trial. The court questioned why the defendant did not have proper clothing a full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11774 - 2005-03-31
the defendant’s clothing for trial. The court questioned why the defendant did not have proper clothing a full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11774 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jerry D. Gragg
implicated him in operating the vehicle while intoxicated—did not provide sufficient probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7633 - 2017-09-19
implicated him in operating the vehicle while intoxicated—did not provide sufficient probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7633 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
22, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 34, 710 N.W.2d 466). ¶7 Hankins contends that the court did not adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30088 - 2014-09-15
22, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 34, 710 N.W.2d 466). ¶7 Hankins contends that the court did not adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30088 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not contain substantial evidence to support the ALJ’s determination that Elayne and Lyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108226 - 2017-09-21
did not contain substantial evidence to support the ALJ’s determination that Elayne and Lyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108226 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, MacArthur was seated in a vehicle that was parked in a lot adjacent to the alley. West did not recall where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82866 - 2012-05-21
, MacArthur was seated in a vehicle that was parked in a lot adjacent to the alley. West did not recall where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82866 - 2012-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
times.” Plautz contends Pudlowski did not have reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34187 - 2008-09-29
times.” Plautz contends Pudlowski did not have reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34187 - 2008-09-29