Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35341 - 35350 of 61299 for judgment.
Search results 35341 - 35350 of 61299 for judgment.
State v. John M. Albrecht
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Rusk County: EDWARD R. BRUNNER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11572 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Rusk County: EDWARD R. BRUNNER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11572 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
has filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Black to appeal judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93888 - 2014-09-15
has filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Black to appeal judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93888 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66201 - 2011-06-20
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66201 - 2011-06-20
CA Blank Order
, granting Waterstone Bank, SSB a judgment of foreclosure. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97315 - 2013-05-21
, granting Waterstone Bank, SSB a judgment of foreclosure. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97315 - 2013-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513295 - 2022-04-26
that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513295 - 2022-04-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and possession of drug paraphernalia. We affirm the judgment of conviction and the order denying his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109188 - 2017-09-21
, and possession of drug paraphernalia. We affirm the judgment of conviction and the order denying his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109188 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Donnevan T. Carter appeals a judgment convicting him of fleeing an officer while in a vehicle. Appointed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289457 - 2020-09-22
). Donnevan T. Carter appeals a judgment convicting him of fleeing an officer while in a vehicle. Appointed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289457 - 2020-09-22
State v. Julian Esteve McKinnie
(1997-98).[1] The complaint, information, and judgment of conviction referenced the statutory sections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20818 - 2005-12-27
(1997-98).[1] The complaint, information, and judgment of conviction referenced the statutory sections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20818 - 2005-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no issue of arguable merit appears, and the judgments are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181418 - 2017-09-21
no issue of arguable merit appears, and the judgments are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181418 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
should have granted him summary judgment based on the fact that the State did not file a reply brief; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30999 - 2007-11-28
should have granted him summary judgment based on the fact that the State did not file a reply brief; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30999 - 2007-11-28