Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35341 - 35350 of 63530 for records.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
court’s order denying this motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759921 - 2024-02-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that No. 2019AP2393 2 this matter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356549 - 2021-04-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to suppress evidence. After reviewing the record and briefs, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175007 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
restitution or to give its reasons on the record for not doing so.” Borst, 181 Wis. 2d at 122, 123. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30637 - 2007-10-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of improper factors. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699505 - 2023-09-06

[PDF] Linda Hanson v. Jerry Christensen
of the record. However, these deeds are part of the record, since they were attached as exhibits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19375 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Louis Ray
4 rationally apply the proper legal standard to the facts of record. See State v. Eckert, 203
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5187 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
of the Record and the no-merit report, we concluded that there were no issues of arguable merit, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62656 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Kiemonte Lamont King
reasonably, and the defendant bears the burden of showing unreasonableness from the record. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10729 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Steven D. Cathey
a discretionary determination by the trial court so long as it considered the facts of record under the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15845 - 2017-09-21