Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35341 - 35350 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 35341 - 35350 of 63951 for records/1000.
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
reviews the record to determine whether it provides a basis for the trial court's exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8889 - 2005-03-31
reviews the record to determine whether it provides a basis for the trial court's exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8889 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470371 - 2022-01-11
denying his motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470371 - 2022-01-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
request for resentencing before a different judge. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109015 - 2017-09-21
request for resentencing before a different judge. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109015 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195918 - 2017-09-21
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195918 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020254 - 2025-10-07
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020254 - 2025-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS
overlooked them. See id., ¶40. The record here reveals that this is not the case. ¶7 At sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106694 - 2014-01-13
overlooked them. See id., ¶40. The record here reveals that this is not the case. ¶7 At sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106694 - 2014-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118589 - 2014-09-15
of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118589 - 2014-09-15
State v. Earl DeWayne Phiffer
not intentionally violated the pretrial order were supported by the record and not clearly erroneous. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19282 - 2005-08-10
not intentionally violated the pretrial order were supported by the record and not clearly erroneous. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19282 - 2005-08-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
(2)(a) requires a circuit court to demonstrate on the record that it considered the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33254 - 2014-09-15
(2)(a) requires a circuit court to demonstrate on the record that it considered the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33254 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 92 Wis. 2d 797, 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). No. 2020AP1429-CR 2 record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542826 - 2022-07-19
, 92 Wis. 2d 797, 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). No. 2020AP1429-CR 2 record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542826 - 2022-07-19