Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35351 - 35360 of 39839 for financial disclosure statement.

State v. Nathan T. Moore
v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 678, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991). The trial court made this statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31

State v. Andrew M. Obriecht
. Obriecht claimed his mother’s statements supported a defense that he lacked intent to commit the crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15669 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jesse Sanchez
statement and urged the jury to consider what the other acts evidence revealed about his character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3093 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
. Muehlbauer testified that she did not mention Matt to the police or in her written statement because she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140852 - 2015-04-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as set forth in the criminal complaint, but noted that Petersdorff’s “statement” lacked any indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80608 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
.[3] Id., ¶18. That includes the sentencing hearing record and a prosecutor’s statement of evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100950 - 2013-08-20

[PDF] Granville Rodgers v. City of Milwaukee
right, and by virtue of the City’s practice of including a statement of appeal rights in the written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14508 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
safety charges. This is consistent with its statement at sentencing that it “wanted to make sure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214593 - 2018-06-27

Alonzo R. Gimenez, M.D. v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
of Appeal Information to the parties which provided the following statement: Serve Petition for Rehearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14014 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that this statement was not inconsistent with the court’s advice regarding the maximum penalty.” ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109016 - 2017-09-21