Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35361 - 35370 of 97620 for court records search online.

[PDF] George Dufield v. Tom McCormick
of the access by adverse possession. Because the record supports the trial court’s determination, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7478 - 2017-09-20

State v. Stanley A. Newago
of the Inga’s life. The court found that the confession, together with the forensic evidence of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3205 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Walter Smith
on the facts of the record, and in accordance with accepted legal principles. D. The court of appeals can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14083 - 2014-09-15

State v. Walter Smith
or the order denying the appeal. This court can only review “those parts of the record made available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14083 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that reviewing courts are limited to the record, and are bound by the record.”). In any event, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116805 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
on the record before us, we agree. Sentencing Counsel addresses whether the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116805 - 2014-07-08

[PDF] Approval Date: 05/19/2016 Page 1
to the Court that the party is requesting to be sealed or redacted in the court record. Who Completes
/formdisplay/GF-245s_summary.pdf?formNumber=GF-245s&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2016-06-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
2020AP1636-CRNM 2 this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=620668 - 2023-02-14

[PDF] Herbert M. Schauer v. Matthew S. Baker
2004 WI App 41 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1674
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5392 - 2017-09-19

Herbert M. Schauer v. Matthew S. Baker
2004 WI App 41 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-1674 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5392 - 2005-03-31