Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35371 - 35380 of 59409 for SMALL CLAIMS.

State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Crochiere much show that his counsel performed deficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9586 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sterling Rachwal
was involved, even though it did not touch the horse's anus. Section 944.17(2)(c), Stats. The State claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7948 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gary A. Malkmus
.” Malkmus now renews his claim that the penalty enhancers on the two home contracting charges are void
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey L. Visnaw
motions for post-conviction relief. He claims that the trial court improperly declined to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8952 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
challenge in the appellate court, not as a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. State v. Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28035 - 2007-02-06

[PDF] Mathew E. Levin v. Shawn M. Radtke
that the trial court failed to cite specific examples of harassment, as she claims is required by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2430 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. James F. Weiher
is the affidavit of Weiher’s prison paralegal claiming he spoke to the victim on the phone and that the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11270 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the sufficiency of the petition is aimed at weeding out meritless or unsupported claims. State v. Arends, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103314 - 2017-09-21

State v. Gary A. Malkmus
.” Malkmus now renews his claim that the penalty enhancers on the two home contracting charges are void
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2005-03-31

State v. Elmer W. VanBoven
the sentencing court’s intent. ¶7 Finally, we do not address VanBoven’s claim that his constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15241 - 2005-03-31