Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35371 - 35380 of 59408 for SMALL CLAIMS.

State v. Jeffrey L. Visnaw
motions for post-conviction relief. He claims that the trial court improperly declined to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8952 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
challenge in the appellate court, not as a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. State v. Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28035 - 2007-02-06

[PDF] Mathew E. Levin v. Shawn M. Radtke
that the trial court failed to cite specific examples of harassment, as she claims is required by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2430 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the sufficiency of the petition is aimed at weeding out meritless or unsupported claims. State v. Arends, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103314 - 2017-09-21

State v. Gary A. Malkmus
.” Malkmus now renews his claim that the penalty enhancers on the two home contracting charges are void
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2005-03-31

State v. Elmer W. VanBoven
the sentencing court’s intent. ¶7 Finally, we do not address VanBoven’s claim that his constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15241 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of conviction follows. The no-merit report addresses whether there would be any arguable merit “to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921949 - 2025-03-04

COURT OF APPEALS
set forth a claim for relief as well as a material issue of fact.” Swatek v. County of Dane, 192 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120140 - 2014-08-25

COURT OF APPEALS
withdrawn or denied. After sentencing, Her filed a postconviction motion claiming ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32464 - 2008-04-16

[PDF] Shane T. Drinkwater v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
principle” under which a party claiming subrogation rights may not recover until the insured is fully
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18781 - 2017-09-21