Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35371 - 35380 of 63710 for records.
Search results 35371 - 35380 of 63710 for records.
David R. Myers v. Kimberly A. Myers
, it shall state in writing or on the record the amount of support that would be required by using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3019 - 2005-03-31
, it shall state in writing or on the record the amount of support that would be required by using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3019 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
without an evidentiary hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97632 - 2013-06-04
without an evidentiary hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97632 - 2013-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court conducted a bench conference off the record, and the prosecutor continued with his closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80927 - 2012-04-16
, the circuit court conducted a bench conference off the record, and the prosecutor continued with his closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80927 - 2012-04-16
State v. James S. Poehlman
Given the record before the jury, we conclude that the circuit court was correct in modifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18632 - 2005-06-20
Given the record before the jury, we conclude that the circuit court was correct in modifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18632 - 2005-06-20
State v. David A. Gayhart
to think clearly at the plea hearing, the record does not bear that out. Gayhart’s responses to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15573 - 2005-03-31
to think clearly at the plea hearing, the record does not bear that out. Gayhart’s responses to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15573 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118470 - 2014-08-05
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118470 - 2014-08-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11
. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
is ambiguous, the reviewing court reviews the record as a whole, including the reconfinement orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60825 - 2014-09-15
is ambiguous, the reviewing court reviews the record as a whole, including the reconfinement orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60825 - 2014-09-15