Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35391 - 35400 of 73716 for ha.

Wayne L. Mehringer v. Marquette County Board of Adjustment
for that of the board, the entity to which the legislature has committed these decisions.” Id. The court’s review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26584 - 2006-09-27

[PDF] Roy G. Hoenecke v. Village of McFarland
Hoenecke contends that, under WIS. STAT. § 32.05(3)(c), “proposed date of occupancy” has to mean “future
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16150 - 2017-09-21

96-03 SCR Chapter 62-Standards of Courtesy and Decorum for the Courts of Wisconsin
courts. The court has considered the petition, the presentations made at the public hearing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1047 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
has filed five postconviction challenges to his conviction, including a direct appeal. In a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88383 - 2012-10-22

[PDF] Libbie Pesek v. Lincoln County
§ 49.015(2)(a), STATS. The legislature has explicitly given the County authority to require general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9544 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, WI 53950-2000 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563900 - 2022-09-13

[PDF] State v. Martin Foral
(1997) (trial court has power to modify terms of probation). The sole ground upon which Foral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12597 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Daniel R. Mc Bride
. McBride has no basis to challenge the trial court's exclusion of lay witness handwriting testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8464 - 2017-09-19

[MS WORD] GN-4380: Petition to Modify Protective Placement or Protective Services
§55.02(2), Wis. Stats. |_| an interested person: 2. There |_| has |_| has
/formdisplay/GN-4380.doc?formNumber=GN-4380&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-07-26

[PDF] State v. Brent L. Barber.
right to file a response. He has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12118 - 2017-09-21