Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3541 - 3550 of 17378 for Cost.

[PDF] WI 77
the full costs of this proceeding, No. 2021AP518-D 2 which total $1,733.49 as of July 6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432211 - 2021-09-28

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Seth P. Hartigan
to pay the cost of these proceedings now totaling $8035.53. ¶4 No appeal has been filed by either
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16803 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
provided, as relevant, that: “Buyer is responsible for all costs and with defense of condemnation and raze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33239 - 2008-06-30

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Converse
for Attorney Converse to pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶3 Attorney Converse was admitted to practice
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16789 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jane Collis Geers v. John F. Geers
costs associated with maintaining two households. See Fowler v. Fowler, 158 Wis. 2d 508, 521, 463
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14772 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
was frivolous and filed maliciously but denying an award of actual costs and attorney fees because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31680 - 2008-02-05

[PDF] Patrick Hart v. Meadows Apartments
the amount of such pecuniary loss, together with costs, including a reasonable attorney’s fee. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7054 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Frontsheet
. The referee also recommended that Attorney Capistrant pay the costs of the proceeding, which total $574.94
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146523 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
for professional misconduct. The referee also recommended that Attorney Capistrant pay the costs of the proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146523 - 2015-08-17

Judson Moeller v. Maple Valley Mutual Insurance Company
private structures, coverage C is for personal property, and coverage D is for additional living costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19127 - 2005-07-25