Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3541 - 3550 of 31223 for WA 0852 2611 9277 RAB Interior Kamar Nuansa Coklat Apartemen Casa de Parco Tangerang.

Ira Lee Anderson-El II v. Ave M. Bie
complaint, Anderson requested a trial de novo in the circuit court. See § 799.207(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15183 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
in a way that defers to the circuit court, and both appear to have been a de novo review. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48816 - 2014-09-15

Nancy Leibly v. Ronald P. Leibly
. Ronald filed a motion for de novo review in the trial court. Through counsel, Ronald agreed to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14509 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mary Boyer
by § 161.41(3r), Stats. This presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we analyze de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8718 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
review de novo. “To the extent the circuit court’s decision involves findings of evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31980 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
review de novo.” State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033303 - 2025-11-05

[PDF] City of Appleton v. Lamar J. Tyrrell
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CANE, C.J. 1 Lamar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4518 - 2017-09-19

10AP2672 State v. Matthew M. Gilbert.doc
on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop. Id. ¶9 Gilbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62149 - 2011-04-05

COURT OF APPEALS
to reopen. ¶4 Fricano appealed from the municipal court order, seeking de novo review in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49797 - 2010-05-11

Bruce E. Larson v. Sandoval Dental Care
of de novo review. See Kolpin v. Pioneer Power & Light Co., Inc., 162 Wis.2d 1, 30, 469 N.W.2d 595, 607
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10765 - 2005-03-31