Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3541 - 3550 of 63485 for records.
Search results 3541 - 3550 of 63485 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the State’s recommendation. This no-merit appeal follows. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111964 - 2017-09-21
with the State’s recommendation. This no-merit appeal follows. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111964 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) motion for summary judgment. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138247 - 2017-09-21
) motion for summary judgment. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138247 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rochelle L. Oestreich
no criminal record and was less culpable than they were. She also argued that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12108 - 2005-03-31
no criminal record and was less culpable than they were. She also argued that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12108 - 2005-03-31
Winnebago County v. Paul M. Nigl
record; second, if we were to construe his petition as a direct appeal, he is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
record; second, if we were to construe his petition as a direct appeal, he is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals pro se from an order denying his motion to obtain various records relating to his 1985
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111939 - 2017-09-21
appeals pro se from an order denying his motion to obtain various records relating to his 1985
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111939 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the record on appeal is unclear regarding credit for the deposit. We therefore reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
, and the record on appeal is unclear regarding credit for the deposit. We therefore reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as Shack’s appellate counsel. No. 2016AP2496-CRNM 2 record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190199 - 2017-09-21
as Shack’s appellate counsel. No. 2016AP2496-CRNM 2 record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190199 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140093 - 2017-09-21
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
CA Blank Order
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133471 - 2015-01-26
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133471 - 2015-01-26