Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3541 - 3550 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 3541 - 3550 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Wisconsin Gas Company v. Allos, Inc.
, Inc. (Allos) appeals the trial court’s judgment, following a court trial, requiring Allos to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14233 - 2005-03-31
, Inc. (Allos) appeals the trial court’s judgment, following a court trial, requiring Allos to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14233 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
] At the plea hearing, the State also told the trial court that part of the agreement was that Caron
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111912 - 2014-05-04
] At the plea hearing, the State also told the trial court that part of the agreement was that Caron
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111912 - 2014-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS
. Yang contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial based on juror bias. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-06
. Yang contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial based on juror bias. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
his motion for a new trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32678 - 2014-09-15
his motion for a new trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32678 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
(collectively, Wagner), on claim preclusion grounds. Omegbu contends that the trial court erred when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15
(collectively, Wagner), on claim preclusion grounds. Omegbu contends that the trial court erred when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to impeach a principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to impeach a principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
State v. Herman Whiterabbit
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4318 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2 At the plea hearing, the State also told the trial court that part of the agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111912 - 2017-09-21
. 2 At the plea hearing, the State also told the trial court that part of the agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111912 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15520 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15520 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15524 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15524 - 2017-09-21