Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3541 - 3550 of 58445 for speedy trial.
Search results 3541 - 3550 of 58445 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to impeach a principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to impeach a principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15524 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15524 - 2017-09-21
Tris S. Treviranus v. Jay Treviranus
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Tris S. Treviranus appeals from the trial court’s “Order Enforcing Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12398 - 2005-03-31
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Tris S. Treviranus appeals from the trial court’s “Order Enforcing Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12398 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Gas Company v. Allos, Inc.
, Inc. (Allos) appeals the trial court’s judgment, following a court trial, requiring Allos to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14233 - 2005-03-31
, Inc. (Allos) appeals the trial court’s judgment, following a court trial, requiring Allos to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14233 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John A. Clements
not challenge his conviction, but instead challenges restitution ordered by the trial judge. Alleged Math
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2734 - 2017-09-19
not challenge his conviction, but instead challenges restitution ordered by the trial judge. Alleged Math
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2734 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
(collectively, Wagner), on claim preclusion grounds. Omegbu contends that the trial court erred when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15
(collectively, Wagner), on claim preclusion grounds. Omegbu contends that the trial court erred when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
grounds. Omegbu contends that the trial court erred when it: (1) refused to enter a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27042 - 2006-11-06
grounds. Omegbu contends that the trial court erred when it: (1) refused to enter a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27042 - 2006-11-06
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15522 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15522 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21