Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3541 - 3550 of 6440 for wide.

[PDF] County of Walworth v. Dillis V. Allen
. It is well established that “[a] trial court has wide discretion in developing the specific language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6198 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as follows: “I understood what the facts were, and it was argument, and I have a pretty wide scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827597 - 2024-07-24

State v. Larry Howard
the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690. A defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14294 - 2010-06-21

Jeffrey L. Woodson v. Marie E. Kreutzer
is wide enough to permit them to pass each other without interference."); Reshan v. Harvey, 63 Wis.2d 524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9823 - 2005-03-31

State v. Corey A. Chatfield
that counsel’s conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance; that is, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2219 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David V. Penn
him. His repeated contravention of the criminal law, which was widely known in the community, caused
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16992 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 15, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
, the defendant must show specific acts or omissions of his attorney that fall “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102961 - 2013-10-14

State v. Shuron C. Davis
must show specific acts or omissions of counsel that are “outside the wide range of professionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4789 - 2005-03-31

William F. Kelsey v. Jens Otto Luebow
, the trial court has “wide discretion” in deciding whether to grant relief under § 806.07, Stats. Price, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11864 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to sentencing factors lies particularly within the wide discretion of the circuit court. State v. Stenzel, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30786 - 2007-11-05