Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35401 - 35410 of 59340 for SMALL CLAIMS.

State v. Tomas Consuegra
, Consuegra claimed that he did not knowingly and intelligently enter his plea because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11391 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Crochiere much show that his counsel performed deficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9589 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Crochiere much show that his counsel performed deficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9588 - 2005-03-31

State v. Douglas Parks
intoxicated, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. Parks claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14146 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey L. Visnaw
motions for post-conviction relief. He claims that the trial court improperly declined to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8952 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sukhbinder Singh
conduct. See WIS. STAT. § 947.01. He claims there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4266 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sentencing, Valdez moved to withdraw his guilty pleas, claiming that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246276 - 2019-09-11

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
challenge in the appellate court, not as a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. State v. Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28035 - 2007-02-06

Production Components-Cloeren, Inc. v. Robert Shakal
theory supporting its claim and must direct the trial court’s attention to issues that are being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4837 - 2005-03-31

Vanessa Henningfield v. Judith Fischer
. Henningfield does not contest the respondents’ rights to claim fees, but contends that the amount was excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14813 - 2005-03-31