Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35401 - 35410 of 63619 for records.
Search results 35401 - 35410 of 63619 for records.
[PDF]
NOTICE
at the February 5, 2009, recommitment hearing. Based on his testimony and a review of other records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46612 - 2014-09-15
at the February 5, 2009, recommitment hearing. Based on his testimony and a review of other records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46612 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Hyland
The record contains a copy of a document entitled “Stipulation & Order,” which apparently refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5237 - 2017-09-19
The record contains a copy of a document entitled “Stipulation & Order,” which apparently refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5237 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
but that Jones was non-compliant. The circuit court also considered Jones’s prior record, his resistance when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29255 - 2007-06-04
but that Jones was non-compliant. The circuit court also considered Jones’s prior record, his resistance when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29255 - 2007-06-04
State v. John A. Rupp
in the record for the sentence complained of. See Petrone, 161 Wis. 2d at 563. ¶9 Rupp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2810 - 2005-03-31
in the record for the sentence complained of. See Petrone, 161 Wis. 2d at 563. ¶9 Rupp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2810 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was significantly compromised by the remote appearance. However, the record and Schultz’s own admissions in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850856 - 2024-09-18
was significantly compromised by the remote appearance. However, the record and Schultz’s own admissions in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850856 - 2024-09-18
State v. Kendrick C. East III
selected the trial date, and the State does not point us to any point in the record that would show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6365 - 2005-03-31
selected the trial date, and the State does not point us to any point in the record that would show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6365 - 2005-03-31
State v. John D. Tiggs, Jr.
, two documents in the record show that Tiggs, while proceeding pro se, brought motions before the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4459 - 2005-03-31
, two documents in the record show that Tiggs, while proceeding pro se, brought motions before the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4459 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Clay F. Teasdale
after the issuance of a scheduling order on March 15, 2004. The record reflected that he has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16823 - 2017-09-21
after the issuance of a scheduling order on March 15, 2004. The record reflected that he has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16823 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State put on the record is what the State said.” The circuit court continued: The Court was the one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283233 - 2020-09-01
the State put on the record is what the State said.” The circuit court continued: The Court was the one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283233 - 2020-09-01
Harry Bruce Pomeroy v. Jennifer Ann Pomeroy
decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26289 - 2006-08-23
decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26289 - 2006-08-23