Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35401 - 35410 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 35401 - 35410 of 58546 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
claimed that trial counsel failed to apprise him of the meaning of the phrase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27588 - 2006-12-26
claimed that trial counsel failed to apprise him of the meaning of the phrase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27588 - 2006-12-26
[PDF]
State v. Ramon R. Rodriguez
with the State, however, that Rodriguez’ argument ignores the trial court’s finding that Rodriguez consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7263 - 2017-09-20
with the State, however, that Rodriguez’ argument ignores the trial court’s finding that Rodriguez consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7263 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Berton D. Sherman v. Don Hagness
provided the estate. The trial court allowed him the executor's commission computed under § 857.05(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8010 - 2017-09-19
provided the estate. The trial court allowed him the executor's commission computed under § 857.05(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8010 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convicting him after a jury trial of one count of burglary and one count of misdemeanor criminal damage
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261004 - 2020-05-19
convicting him after a jury trial of one count of burglary and one count of misdemeanor criminal damage
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261004 - 2020-05-19
State v. Ramon R. Rodriguez
with the State, however, that Rodriguez’ argument ignores the trial court’s finding that Rodriguez consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7263 - 2005-03-31
with the State, however, that Rodriguez’ argument ignores the trial court’s finding that Rodriguez consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7263 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an affidavit and a cost estimate. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 Riese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85609 - 2014-09-15
an affidavit and a cost estimate. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 Riese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85609 - 2014-09-15
Terry Donskey v. Steve Rickert
in the Rickerts’ favor and awarded them $12,500 in damages. The trial court vacated that award, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10751 - 2005-03-31
in the Rickerts’ favor and awarded them $12,500 in damages. The trial court vacated that award, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10751 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Zimmerlee
, the trial court entered an order on March 12, 2004, denying the motion. Zimmerlee did not appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24943 - 2017-09-21
, the trial court entered an order on March 12, 2004, denying the motion. Zimmerlee did not appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24943 - 2017-09-21
Sentry Insurance v. Jim Piontek Trucking, Inc.
that the trial court erred by concluding Commercial Union did not owe a duty to defend or indemnify Piontek under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11035 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred by concluding Commercial Union did not owe a duty to defend or indemnify Piontek under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11035 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Miller
this court to review the sentencing decision of the trial court. “It is axiomatic that an appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2409 - 2017-09-19
this court to review the sentencing decision of the trial court. “It is axiomatic that an appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2409 - 2017-09-19