Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35411 - 35420 of 59310 for SMALL CLAIMS.

State v. Robert C. Braun
to § 785.01(1)(b), Stats., for violating a permanent injunction. He claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12045 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David W. Pender
surrounding the breath test were disputed at the suppression hearing. Pender claimed that he was not given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12582 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
has no factual basis to support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33502 - 2008-07-23

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
challenge in the appellate court, not as a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. State v. Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28035 - 2007-02-06

Jim Mattson v. Thomas O. Schultz
of the Mattsons' claims that Schultz was negligent and inadequate in preparing their case, that he told them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9817 - 2005-03-31

Charles Michael Keys v. Bonni Jo Keys
$65,000 annually and she no longer has Charles's health insurance. She claims that she cannot support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13058 - 2005-03-31

Ronald S. Schilling v. Sandra Sweney
dismissing his certiorari action for failure to file a brief. He claims the dismissal was an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14288 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Evenson’s claim under the policy, Evenson filed the underlying action for summary declaratory judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52898 - 2010-08-02

Mathew E. Levin v. Shawn M. Radtke
to cite specific examples of harassment, as she claims is required by State v. Sarlund, 139 Wis. 2d 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2430 - 2005-03-31

Terry K. Voice v. Mary Ellen Johnson
a $345 share of the $442 tax rebate. He also claims the court overvalued certain assets, undervalued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2876 - 2005-03-31