Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35411 - 35420 of 68259 for law.

State v. Yolanda L.
, the application of the U. S. Constitution to those facts is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Patricia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5810 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
was the only black man in the courtroom and the identification was impermissibly suggestive. However, the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80090 - 2012-03-26

[PDF] NOTICE
Neither side attempted to have the deputy, an experienced law enforcement officer, characterize the odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57084 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Joseph Mullen v. Douglas J. Walczak
. After surveying the case law and reviewing the decision in Gocha, the court of appeals stated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16584 - 2017-09-21

Rainald Schurmann v. Guy Neau
to determine whether it joins an issue of material fact or law. Id. If we determine that the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2233 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Pedro Figueroa
according to law or that a distinctive group of persons was systematically excluded from jury service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18032 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
for Miranda purposes is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. The trial court determined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139735 - 2015-04-14

COURT OF APPEALS
if there are no genuine issues of material fact and if the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Ibid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79396 - 2012-03-12

[PDF] State v. Robert G. Harkey
). However, whether counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11408 - 2017-09-19

State v. Anthony J. Dentici, Jr.
., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo.” State v. Beiersdorf, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4110 - 2005-03-31