Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35421 - 35430 of 83168 for case code.
Search results 35421 - 35430 of 83168 for case code.
[PDF]
State v. Brad E. Glaunert
. ¶12 The matter proceeded to a two-day jury trial in June 2002. At the close of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5873 - 2017-09-19
. ¶12 The matter proceeded to a two-day jury trial in June 2002. At the close of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5873 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP2705 Cir. Ct. No. 2009CV1813
to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.61 this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69689 - 2014-09-15
to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.61 this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69689 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the case; Lovelace’s argument on appeal relates to the second note. In that note, the jury asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209233 - 2018-03-06
to the case; Lovelace’s argument on appeal relates to the second note. In that note, the jury asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209233 - 2018-03-06
[PDF]
Susan Schindelholz v. Joseph Vincenti
, 433 N.W.2d 243 (1989), is analogous to her case; (3) the requirements for filing a notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7336 - 2017-09-20
, 433 N.W.2d 243 (1989), is analogous to her case; (3) the requirements for filing a notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7336 - 2017-09-20
State v. Mark D. O'Kray
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case concerns a one-acre parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199213 - 2017-10-26
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case concerns a one-acre parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199213 - 2017-10-26
[PDF]
Dorothea Hackmann v. Randy Behm
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10042 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10042 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cited no case law supporting his novel theory that a defendant relying upon his attorney’s advice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97429 - 2014-09-15
cited no case law supporting his novel theory that a defendant relying upon his attorney’s advice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97429 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James Schuette v. Ronald L. Van De Hey
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-0452 For Complete Title of Case, see attached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10387 - 2017-09-20
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-0452 For Complete Title of Case, see attached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10387 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-18).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08
-18).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08