Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35421 - 35430 of 68257 for law.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
rendered ineffective assistance is a mixed question of fact and law. State v. Breitzman, 2017 WI 100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233846 - 2019-01-29

[PDF] NOTICE
the Honorable Ralph M. Ramirez.2 This court’s prior opinions are the law of the case. The law of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44371 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] William J. Keefe v. Ronald A. Arthur
. Arthur were attorneys licensed to practice law in Wisconsin. Ronald A. Arthur’s license has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19964 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jonothan Gils
of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216, 395 N.W.2d at 181. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2170 - 2005-03-31

State v. Corey A. Chatfield
the performance and the prejudice components are mixed questions of fact and law. We must accept the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2219 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
relies on case law decided under § 805.03 and § 804.12(2)(a)[4] holding that a court may not impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32463 - 2008-04-16

COURT OF APPEALS
affirming a decision of an administrative law judge (ALJ) for the Division of Hearings and Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56207 - 2010-11-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether an issue is moot is a question of law that we review de novo. Marathon County v. D.K., 2020 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375235 - 2021-06-09

Arthur H. Hurckman v. Secura Insurance Company
established his or her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Germanotta v. National Indem. Co., 119 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9898 - 2005-03-31

William J. Keefe v. Ronald A. Arthur
), and the final findings of fact and conclusions of law had not yet been signed by the Marquette County trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19964 - 2005-10-17