Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35421 - 35430 of 63539 for records.
Search results 35421 - 35430 of 63539 for records.
Secura Insurance Company v. Jerry Brubaker
was not egregious as a matter of law because no reasonable judge could decide that it was based on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6087 - 2014-12-22
was not egregious as a matter of law because no reasonable judge could decide that it was based on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6087 - 2014-12-22
State v. Randy R. Mertz
, the findings or opinion of the trial court and limited portions of the record essential to an understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8617 - 2005-03-31
, the findings or opinion of the trial court and limited portions of the record essential to an understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8617 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carolyn L.C.
, Stats.[3] After reviewing the record, this court concludes that the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15702 - 2005-03-31
, Stats.[3] After reviewing the record, this court concludes that the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15702 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
State v. Richard Stensvad
. App. 1994). The trial court must resolve conflicts in the testimony, and where the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7699 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1994). The trial court must resolve conflicts in the testimony, and where the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7699 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Further, in the recorded statement given by Keys to the officers, there is no mention of the pills or Keys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70353 - 2011-08-29
. Further, in the recorded statement given by Keys to the officers, there is no mention of the pills or Keys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70353 - 2011-08-29
State v. Dennis R. Hyland
. The Dane County charge was dismissed, apparently on March 1, 2000.[2] The record contains a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5237 - 2005-03-31
. The Dane County charge was dismissed, apparently on March 1, 2000.[2] The record contains a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5237 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
recalled five months earlier but the county records had not been updated. The court observed that “[w]hen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44070 - 2009-11-30
recalled five months earlier but the county records had not been updated. The court observed that “[w]hen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44070 - 2009-11-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97209 - 2014-09-15
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97209 - 2014-09-15