Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35431 - 35440 of 63986 for records/1000.
Search results 35431 - 35440 of 63986 for records/1000.
State v. Quinn Johnson
and the record does not disclose any specific prejudice that resulted from his counsel’s failure to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14074 - 2005-03-31
and the record does not disclose any specific prejudice that resulted from his counsel’s failure to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14074 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
was not relevant evidence in this case. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102844 - 2013-10-07
was not relevant evidence in this case. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102844 - 2013-10-07
State v. Bernard L. Beyer
prison sentence was also offered.[1] The record also contains Beyer's presentence report, which states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11889 - 2005-03-31
prison sentence was also offered.[1] The record also contains Beyer's presentence report, which states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11889 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
reviews the record to determine whether it provides a basis for the trial court's exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8889 - 2005-03-31
reviews the record to determine whether it provides a basis for the trial court's exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8889 - 2005-03-31
Waushara County Department of Human Services v. Jacob A.S.
(1993). A court properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2141 - 2005-03-31
(1993). A court properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2141 - 2005-03-31
State v. Glen Joyner
intended to make an oral motion in limine if the case went to trial. Nothing in the record suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2414 - 2005-03-31
intended to make an oral motion in limine if the case went to trial. Nothing in the record suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2414 - 2005-03-31
Cristy L. Rasmussen and the v. Anthony W. Deuster
citations to the record. Further, we have not found testimony from either Wrensch or Barrows that prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3771 - 2005-03-31
citations to the record. Further, we have not found testimony from either Wrensch or Barrows that prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3771 - 2005-03-31
City of Stevens Point v. John Pliska
and that the record fails to show he was in default on the mortgage. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16304 - 2005-03-31
and that the record fails to show he was in default on the mortgage. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16304 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul R. Brzycki
motion seeking to withdraw his plea.[3] We disagree. ¶8 The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7198 - 2005-03-31
motion seeking to withdraw his plea.[3] We disagree. ¶8 The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7198 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450872 - 2021-11-09
2 of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450872 - 2021-11-09