Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35441 - 35450 of 91114 for 1.

COURT OF APPEALS
remanded with directions. Before Vergeront, Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2007-11-14

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J. Defendants Jesse Franklin and Jeffery Huck
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17515 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] County of Milwaukee v. Superior of Wisconsin, Inc.
., Fine and Schudson, JJ. ¶1 WEDEMEYER, P.J. Superior of Wisconsin, Inc. and Fairway Transit, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14579 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 2
remanded with directions. Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J., and Reilly, J. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75165 - 2014-09-15

County of Milwaukee v. Fairway Transit, Inc.
. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Schudson, JJ. ¶1 WEDEMEYER, P.J. Superior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14604 - 2005-03-31

State v. Steve Yang
., Fine and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Steve Yang appeals from a judgment entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6528 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Brad Michael L. v. Lee D.
., is obligated to pay. Brad argues that the trial court erred in concluding: (1) that Lee had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8284 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J. Defendants Jesse Franklin and Jeffery Huck
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17516 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jonathon Gils
, 940.19(2), 940.19(5), and 943.32(1)(a) & (2), Stats. Gils also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11826 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or authority, except for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532084 - 2022-06-14