Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35441 - 35450 of 68466 for did.
Search results 35441 - 35450 of 68466 for did.
State v. Kenneth R. Parrish
level. Because the trial court did not err in denying his motion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20778 - 2005-12-27
level. Because the trial court did not err in denying his motion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20778 - 2005-12-27
Eddie D. Cannon v. State
of property. He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motions. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8640 - 2005-03-31
of property. He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motions. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8640 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joshua W.
error in waiving the need for a written dispositional order since it did so on Joshua's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9444 - 2017-09-19
error in waiving the need for a written dispositional order since it did so on Joshua's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9444 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court, the Kramschusters argued that the family court did not determine what the final guardian ad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160965 - 2017-09-21
court, the Kramschusters argued that the family court did not determine what the final guardian ad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160965 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony, the error was harmless, and that the circuit court did not err when it denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39950 - 2009-08-25
testimony, the error was harmless, and that the circuit court did not err when it denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39950 - 2009-08-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in prison to pay restitution. Conley did not have a direct appeal. However, in July 2018, he sent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314081 - 2020-12-16
in prison to pay restitution. Conley did not have a direct appeal. However, in July 2018, he sent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314081 - 2020-12-16
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Samantha E.
to objectively consider whether Francis’s parental rights should be terminated. Because Francis did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14127 - 2005-03-31
to objectively consider whether Francis’s parental rights should be terminated. Because Francis did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14127 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Erica S.
the case. She asserted that the intake worker did not comply with the forty-day time limit to refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2884 - 2017-09-19
the case. She asserted that the intake worker did not comply with the forty-day time limit to refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2884 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert A. Kerbell v. Otter Creek Builders, LLC
the buy- back provision and demanded that Otter Creek repurchase the unit. Otter Creek did not respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2104 - 2017-09-19
the buy- back provision and demanded that Otter Creek repurchase the unit. Otter Creek did not respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2104 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the police report and the officer’s testimony, he did not increase his speed when he turned onto Lake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52691 - 2014-09-15
to the police report and the officer’s testimony, he did not increase his speed when he turned onto Lake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52691 - 2014-09-15