Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35441 - 35450 of 57247 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 19, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.’” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104434 - 2013-11-18

[PDF] Jane L. Trucksa v. Joseph B. Snyder
). We must first determine whether the complaint states a claim. Id. If the complaint states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10732 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
credibility’ or ‘slight’” is sufficient to satisfy the defendant’s burden. Id., ¶17 (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215254 - 2018-07-05

COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous.” Id. “However, the question of whether those changes are substantial is a question of law which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143090 - 2015-06-15

[PDF] State v. Donald R. Wield
conviction. See id. ¶19 Looking to the facts of Wield’s prior convictions, it is readily apparent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5584 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Darrent Britt v. Jane Gamble
parole release scheme. Id. at ¶8; see also WIS. STAT. § 302.11(1g). Under this scheme, a prisoner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4896 - 2017-09-19

John C. Kastor v. Roberta K. Kastor
) (citation omitted). Indeed, “we generally look for reasons to sustain discretionary decisions.” Id. at 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14368 - 2005-03-31

Langlade County v. Janet S.
relevant circumstances of the case.” Id. ¶16 There is nothing in the record to indicate that Eugene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4249 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of cognitive or volitional control over his or her thoughts or actions. Id. ¶4 The fifth standard also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573746 - 2022-10-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.’” Id. (citation omitted). ¶18 Cornerstone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104434 - 2017-09-21