Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35451 - 35460 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35451 - 35460 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Buford
He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Buford claims: (1) he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6924 - 2017-09-20
He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Buford claims: (1) he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6924 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
On June 16, Hodgell, once more pro se, filed an ex parte motion in the court of appeals for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30485 - 2014-09-15
On June 16, Hodgell, once more pro se, filed an ex parte motion in the court of appeals for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30485 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
when it granted the State’s motion for a protective order after the State failed to respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31959 - 2008-02-27
when it granted the State’s motion for a protective order after the State failed to respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31959 - 2008-02-27
Dane Co. DHS v. Shetria B.
motion to vacate those orders. Shetria B. contends that the circuit court lost competency to exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26536 - 2006-09-20
motion to vacate those orders. Shetria B. contends that the circuit court lost competency to exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26536 - 2006-09-20
State v. Robert W. Wodenjak
offender pursuant to § 346.65(2)(d). Wodenjak challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3401 - 2005-03-31
offender pursuant to § 346.65(2)(d). Wodenjak challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3401 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. Barnes argues that the circuit court relied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202742 - 2017-11-16
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. Barnes argues that the circuit court relied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202742 - 2017-11-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173983 - 2017-09-21
appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173983 - 2017-09-21
T & T Masonry, Inc. v. Roxton Associates
of intent is not one that properly can be decided on a motion for summary judgment. Credibility of a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9839 - 2005-03-31
of intent is not one that properly can be decided on a motion for summary judgment. Credibility of a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9839 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronan T. Heaney
-FT 03-0423-FT 2 on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it denied Heaney’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6167 - 2017-09-19
-FT 03-0423-FT 2 on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it denied Heaney’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6167 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Carolyn G.
. 02-0624, 02-0625 & 02-0626 3 exercised its discretion when it denied her motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5013 - 2017-09-19
. 02-0624, 02-0625 & 02-0626 3 exercised its discretion when it denied her motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5013 - 2017-09-19