Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35461 - 35470 of 61717 for does.
Search results 35461 - 35470 of 61717 for does.
State v. Todd S. Meske
intake had not taken any action on the case. Mast testified that he does not recall whether he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11584 - 2005-03-31
intake had not taken any action on the case. Mast testified that he does not recall whether he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11584 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
does not mean the court erroneously exercised its discretion. Had the court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98731 - 2013-06-27
does not mean the court erroneously exercised its discretion. Had the court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98731 - 2013-06-27
State v. Eric L. King
does not preclude a finding of consent to search, though it is a factor to be considered. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26361 - 2006-09-05
does not preclude a finding of consent to search, though it is a factor to be considered. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26361 - 2006-09-05
Noel McChristian v. Transportation Insurance Company
, that the result which occurred does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence; (2) the agent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11880 - 2005-03-31
, that the result which occurred does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence; (2) the agent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11880 - 2005-03-31
Tommy Brown v. Gary R. McCaughtry
the extra cash. He may not go for it, but it won’t hurt to put it out there, cause he does do certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20070 - 2005-10-26
the extra cash. He may not go for it, but it won’t hurt to put it out there, cause he does do certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20070 - 2005-10-26
[PDF]
State v. Mark B. Hodge
interpretation of counsel’s questions, in context, does not necessarily limit Tiama’s answer to a single
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21661 - 2017-09-21
interpretation of counsel’s questions, in context, does not necessarily limit Tiama’s answer to a single
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21661 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
modification based on the “interest of justice[,]” but he does not assert this claim on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669231 - 2023-06-21
modification based on the “interest of justice[,]” but he does not assert this claim on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669231 - 2023-06-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and addressed within the CHIPS proceedings, and Airola does not explain why Thuecks was required to report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898488 - 2025-01-09
and addressed within the CHIPS proceedings, and Airola does not explain why Thuecks was required to report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898488 - 2025-01-09
[PDF]
State v. John E. Triplett
looked to the victim impact statement of Amelia Summerville. While this statement does not directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12544 - 2017-09-21
looked to the victim impact statement of Amelia Summerville. While this statement does not directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12544 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony E. Kohel
by asking for identification and why Kohel was there, the community caretaker function does not authorize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9291 - 2017-09-19
by asking for identification and why Kohel was there, the community caretaker function does not authorize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9291 - 2017-09-19