Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35461 - 35470 of 63579 for records.

COURT OF APPEALS
otherwise noted. [2] We note that Nirmaier failed to provide citations to the record in his statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75739 - 2011-12-27

Harry Bruce Pomeroy v. Jennifer Ann Pomeroy
decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26289 - 2006-08-23

COURT OF APPEALS
court reviews the record as a whole, including the reconfinement orders, to determine the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60825 - 2011-03-08

COURT OF APPEALS
to the no-merit report. We conducted an independent review of the record, as required by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35937 - 2009-03-23

[PDF] NOTICE
is transferred under s. 800.04(1) or 800.05(3) to a court of record. (b) If equitable relief is demanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48251 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625928 - 2023-02-23

COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration, and the State filed a notice of appeal. The record was transmitted to this court before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36256 - 2009-04-22

[PDF] State v. Randy R. Mertz
, the findings or opinion of the trial court and limited portions of the record essential to an understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8617 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. On this record, we cannot say there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178968 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
is neither cited by the parties, nor does it appear to be part of the record on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31243 - 2014-09-15