Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35461 - 35470 of 63579 for records.
Search results 35461 - 35470 of 63579 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
than $3000, including five twenty-dollar bills whose serial numbers were pre- recorded. Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118202 - 2014-09-15
than $3000, including five twenty-dollar bills whose serial numbers were pre- recorded. Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118202 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the remaining amount of the forfeiture. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135204 - 2017-09-21
the remaining amount of the forfeiture. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135204 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Background ¶2 The following facts are taken from the record. In 1994, Klawitter and Howe entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34799 - 2014-09-15
. Background ¶2 The following facts are taken from the record. In 1994, Klawitter and Howe entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34799 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Paul J. Koch
to stop for a flashing red signal, the intoxilyzer test record, the arresting officer’s police report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13237 - 2017-09-21
to stop for a flashing red signal, the intoxilyzer test record, the arresting officer’s police report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13237 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on factual claims that were refuted by the record. We confined our review to three issues: (1) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162835 - 2017-09-21
on factual claims that were refuted by the record. We confined our review to three issues: (1) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162835 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
State v. Robert J. DeFliger
this issue at the postconviction hearing, and thus he failed to make a record of trial counsel’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2934 - 2005-03-31
this issue at the postconviction hearing, and thus he failed to make a record of trial counsel’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2934 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
were void because they (1) violated Wisconsin’s open meetings and public records laws, (2) violated UW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31966 - 2008-02-27
were void because they (1) violated Wisconsin’s open meetings and public records laws, (2) violated UW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31966 - 2008-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was significantly compromised by the remote appearance. However, the record and Schultz’s own admissions in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850856 - 2024-09-18
was significantly compromised by the remote appearance. However, the record and Schultz’s own admissions in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850856 - 2024-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for reconsideration. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208831 - 2018-02-21
for reconsideration. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208831 - 2018-02-21