Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35471 - 35480 of 39932 for financial disclosure statement.

COURT OF APPEALS
prejudice. The circuit court’s reinstruction was an erroneous statement of the law. But a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84177 - 2012-06-27

Rule Order
other cases also. I was surprised by these statements (which I have not checked for accuracy) because
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82165 - 2012-05-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of anything else in the record, except the subjective statements of the defendant and the observations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811625 - 2024-06-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the Board could not rely on Madsen’s statements absent other evidence of corroboration: “a study or prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398946 - 2021-07-28

Frontsheet
at the hearing before the referee to challenge those statements. ¶27 Although Attorney Kostich maintains
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89666 - 2012-11-28

COURT OF APPEALS
statement of the law. The 1973-74 statutes explicitly provided for the parties to stipulate to a division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132031 - 2014-12-22

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
about “rape trauma syndrome;” strike a juror for cause; and object to references to a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27895 - 2007-01-22

State v. Johnny L. Hampton
police officers who investigated the crimes, apprehended the defendants and took statements. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12124 - 2005-03-31

State v. James A. Sybers
. SYBERS: Well, I don’t really want to but— THE COURT: You should read that statement prior to signing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5668 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by the statement of concerns which you have raised from this fellow and the Court’s review of the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257576 - 2020-04-14