Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35471 - 35480 of 63537 for records.
Search results 35471 - 35480 of 63537 for records.
State v. Daniel H. Frasch
finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record." The reference to "any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10271 - 2005-03-31
finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record." The reference to "any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10271 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the affidavit alleged that a routine check of Marsh’s driving record showed that he had three prior OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238889 - 2019-04-11
, the affidavit alleged that a routine check of Marsh’s driving record showed that he had three prior OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238889 - 2019-04-11
COURT OF APPEALS
of record, the correct legal standard, and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court’s decision. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52528 - 2010-07-27
of record, the correct legal standard, and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court’s decision. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52528 - 2010-07-27
Joan Solie v. Employee Trust Funds Board
that the years of teaching service remained in their records, but was not a “credit” and did not fulfill
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1248 - 2004-03-22
that the years of teaching service remained in their records, but was not a “credit” and did not fulfill
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1248 - 2004-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS
but that Jones was non-compliant. The circuit court also considered Jones’s prior record, his resistance when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29255 - 2007-06-04
but that Jones was non-compliant. The circuit court also considered Jones’s prior record, his resistance when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29255 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts in the record. Steinmann v. Steinmann, 2008 WI 43, ¶20, 309 Wis. 2d 29, 749 N.W.2d 145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72370 - 2014-09-15
the facts in the record. Steinmann v. Steinmann, 2008 WI 43, ¶20, 309 Wis. 2d 29, 749 N.W.2d 145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72370 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607849 - 2023-01-06
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607849 - 2023-01-06
Linda Premeau v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
, under Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 80.24, as a “statement … taken by a recording device.” The commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2201 - 2005-03-31
, under Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 80.24, as a “statement … taken by a recording device.” The commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2201 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103477 - 2013-10-22
responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103477 - 2013-10-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2019AP1048 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314081 - 2020-12-16
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2019AP1048 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314081 - 2020-12-16