Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35481 - 35490 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 35481 - 35490 of 98406 for court records search online.
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
record would require the court to ignore almost everything that is known of him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9586 - 2005-03-31
record would require the court to ignore almost everything that is known of him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9586 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
record would require the court to ignore almost everything that is known of him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9587 - 2005-03-31
record would require the court to ignore almost everything that is known of him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9587 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
conviction. To ignore his juvenile record would require the court to ignore almost everything that is known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9588 - 2017-09-19
conviction. To ignore his juvenile record would require the court to ignore almost everything that is known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9588 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
record would require the court to ignore almost everything that is known of him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9589 - 2005-03-31
record would require the court to ignore almost everything that is known of him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael Modrow
owned and operated a tavern and restaurant and had no prior record. The trial court observed that "we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10220 - 2017-09-20
owned and operated a tavern and restaurant and had no prior record. The trial court observed that "we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10220 - 2017-09-20
State v. Tomas Consuegra
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the trial court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11391 - 2005-03-31
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the trial court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry A. Tollefson
. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12564 - 2017-09-21
. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12564 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Choice W. E.
weight to the court's conclusion. However, the record evidence is not sufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9276 - 2017-09-19
weight to the court's conclusion. However, the record evidence is not sufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9276 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Modrow
owned and operated a tavern and restaurant and had no prior record. The trial court observed that "we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10203 - 2017-09-20
owned and operated a tavern and restaurant and had no prior record. The trial court observed that "we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10203 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The record shows Marinko was aware of the maximum sentence the court could impose. He had rejected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102924 - 2017-09-21
. The record shows Marinko was aware of the maximum sentence the court could impose. He had rejected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102924 - 2017-09-21