Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35481 - 35490 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 35481 - 35490 of 58245 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel. He also asserts the trial court impermissibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33845 - 2008-08-25
contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel. He also asserts the trial court impermissibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33845 - 2008-08-25
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 18-03 supporting memo
. The trial court struck the late answer, denied the motion to enlarge time, and entered an order
/supreme/docs/1803memo.pdf - 2018-04-05
. The trial court struck the late answer, denied the motion to enlarge time, and entered an order
/supreme/docs/1803memo.pdf - 2018-04-05
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - November 2010
, the defendant asks the Supreme Court to review whether a new trial must be held in the interest of justice
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56270 - 2014-09-15
, the defendant asks the Supreme Court to review whether a new trial must be held in the interest of justice
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56270 - 2014-09-15
Marc J. Ackerman v. Malcolm K. Hatfield
without the benefit of a trial. We agree and reverse the summary judgment. FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7459 - 2005-03-31
without the benefit of a trial. We agree and reverse the summary judgment. FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7459 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and his trial attorney testified. After considering the witnesses’ testimony, the court denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572612 - 2022-10-04
and his trial attorney testified. After considering the witnesses’ testimony, the court denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572612 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
at sentencing, and he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48820 - 2014-09-15
at sentencing, and he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48820 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
., was inadequate and, therefore, the writ should not have been quashed by the trial court. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21
., was inadequate and, therefore, the writ should not have been quashed by the trial court. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21
Patrick J. Brick v. Janet O'Brien-Brick
Hospital, and its insurer.[1] The trial court ruled that the statute of limitations had expired. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9824 - 2005-03-31
Hospital, and its insurer.[1] The trial court ruled that the statute of limitations had expired. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9824 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Kuper’s attorney to testify at trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are taken from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71555 - 2011-09-28
Kuper’s attorney to testify at trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are taken from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71555 - 2011-09-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) the sentencing court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing; and (2) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603520 - 2022-12-22
) the sentencing court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing; and (2) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603520 - 2022-12-22