Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35491 - 35500 of 91150 for 1.
Search results 35491 - 35500 of 91150 for 1.
Richard G. Bean v. Marilyn J. Bean
Eich, Vergeront and Roggensack, JJ ¶1 PER CURIAM. Richard Bean appeals from the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2320 - 2005-03-31
Eich, Vergeront and Roggensack, JJ ¶1 PER CURIAM. Richard Bean appeals from the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2320 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
., and Thomas Cane, Reserve Judge. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael Winius, pro se, appeals an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74538 - 2011-11-28
., and Thomas Cane, Reserve Judge. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael Winius, pro se, appeals an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74538 - 2011-11-28
CA Blank Order
on appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21.[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136289 - 2015-03-02
on appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21.[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136289 - 2015-03-02
[PDF]
Karen Wisemiller v. Kenneth Wisemiller
. SMELTZER, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16229 - 2017-09-21
. SMELTZER, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16229 - 2017-09-21
State v. James F. Emerich
, JJ.[1] ¶1 PER CURIAM. James Emerich appeals judgments convicting him of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2359 - 2005-03-31
, JJ.[1] ¶1 PER CURIAM. James Emerich appeals judgments convicting him of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2359 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lothar W. Penkert
for reconsideration.[1] He raises the following issues: (1) that he has an “inalienable right” to travel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11972 - 2005-03-31
for reconsideration.[1] He raises the following issues: (1) that he has an “inalienable right” to travel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11972 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2015AP2280 2 ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J. 1 Valerie Kreger-Mueller appeals, pro se, the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172919 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP2280 2 ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J. 1 Valerie Kreger-Mueller appeals, pro se, the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172919 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Richard C. Glesner
ATTORNEY disciplinary proceeding. Attorney's license suspended. ¶1 PER CURIAM We review, pursuant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17590 - 2017-09-21
ATTORNEY disciplinary proceeding. Attorney's license suspended. ¶1 PER CURIAM We review, pursuant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17590 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark M. Loutsch
, Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark Loutsch challenges on appeal the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6639 - 2005-03-31
, Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark Loutsch challenges on appeal the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6639 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
court for Sauk County: PATRICK TAGGART, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.1 Gregory Dolensek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44960 - 2014-09-15
court for Sauk County: PATRICK TAGGART, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.1 Gregory Dolensek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44960 - 2014-09-15