Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35491 - 35500 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 35491 - 35500 of 83278 for case search.
State v. Tory L. Rachel
2002 WI 81 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 00-0467 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16357 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI 81 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 00-0467 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16357 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 29
2009 WI 29 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2007AP1403-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36312 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI 29 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2007AP1403-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36312 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2018 WI 19 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP832 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209409 - 2018-05-04
2018 WI 19 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP832 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209409 - 2018-05-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prison sentence in a Waukesha County case in which sentence was imposed consecutive to his sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349567 - 2021-03-25
prison sentence in a Waukesha County case in which sentence was imposed consecutive to his sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349567 - 2021-03-25
[PDF]
Mark R. Kosieradzki v. Lori Mathys
2002 WI App 191 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0026-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4792 - 2017-09-20
2002 WI App 191 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0026-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4792 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Real Estate Enterprises, LLC v. June J. Marth
or other proof to determine whether a prima facie case for summary judgment has been presented. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11521 - 2017-09-19
or other proof to determine whether a prima facie case for summary judgment has been presented. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11521 - 2017-09-19
Su Wings Corporation v. City of Lake Geneva
we conclude that summary judgment was appropriate in both cases, we affirm. ¶2 While these two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5506 - 2005-03-31
we conclude that summary judgment was appropriate in both cases, we affirm. ¶2 While these two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5506 - 2005-03-31
Su Wings Corporation v. City of Lake Geneva
we conclude that summary judgment was appropriate in both cases, we affirm. ¶2 While these two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5241 - 2005-03-31
we conclude that summary judgment was appropriate in both cases, we affirm. ¶2 While these two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5241 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
discretion. Rohloff v. Folkman, 174 Wis. 504, 506, 182 N.W. 735 (1921). As in all cases where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31914 - 2014-09-15
discretion. Rohloff v. Folkman, 174 Wis. 504, 506, 182 N.W. 735 (1921). As in all cases where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31914 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Adam Austin-White v. Todd C. Young
2005 WI App 52 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 04-0943
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7445 - 2017-09-20
2005 WI App 52 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 04-0943
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7445 - 2017-09-20